Wednesday, July 12, 2006

世界盃之幾多人睇決賽

星期日晚看世界盃決賽,中場休息時望出窗外,見到對面兩座大廈不少單位有燈亮著,真的有不少人在看直播。有相為證。



用這幅相可以做個小統計,看看大概有多少人有看決賽直播。相中的兩幢大廈,右邊一幢每層可以見到四個單位,左邊一幢見到三個,最左邊的單位不是每層都見得到,所以省去。右邊一幢有29層,左邊的有28層,所以可供統計的樣本有29 x 4 + 28 x 3 = 200。在週日凌晨三時還有燈光的單位,相信都是在看直播,這樣的單位有88個。所以看直播的單位有88/200% = 44%,接近一半!

10 Comments:

At Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:29:00 pm, Anonymous Fei said...

Everybody's watching...

I'll open Now TV ar...

Can't stand without FA Cup...

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:29:00 pm, Anonymous One Ken said...

其實有左賭波後睇波變得更瘋狂...

Fei,
Now TV 除了有FA Cup 外,更有歐聯... sigh... 冇得睇....

 
At Thursday, July 13, 2006 12:28:00 pm, Blogger Ka Lok said...

FA Cup就冇乜所謂,都慣左冇得睇。冇歐聯真係…sigh… 淘汰賽階段真係幾好睇,但係週中凌晨三點幾又冇理由落bar睇,點算?

Fei, Now TV 幾多錢?

 
At Monday, July 17, 2006 10:02:00 am, Anonymous Fei said...

HK$138/month. And if you're Cable subscriber, you can get 6-month fee rebate...

 
At Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:20:00 am, Blogger Terry said...

世界盃期間的半夜三更都有八卦望出窗外,看見低層某戶的電視晝面與家中的不同,發現原來不是人人也看世界盃的!

 
At Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:59:00 am, Blogger Ka Lok said...

RE: Terry

是不是你在中場休息的時候望出窗外,你看有線別人看無線,所以畫面不同?

不過以上只是假設的問題,我都相信總有人深夜不睡都不是看世界盃。比較嚴謹的方法是在世界盃過了之後的週日深夜同樣時間看看有多少戶有燈光亮著,用這個數減去之前所得,結果可能比較可信。不過沒有世界盃,我還是繼續睡覺比較好。

 
At Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:01:00 am, Blogger Ka Lok said...

Now TV $138/month都算可以接受,不過如果同時有「有線」又唔cut,加埋要>$400/month就比較肉痛。

 
At Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:42:00 pm, Anonymous Fei said...

If Cable can't get Premier League, I wanna terminate it ar...but actually I've bound in a two-and-a-half year contract ar...

 
At Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:25:00 am, Anonymous One Ken said...

re: Ka Lok

你的「世界盃嚴謹減燈理論」實在太科學化了,不如你找晚真的付諸實行吧,令一眾奉霍金為偶像如我等後輩可以追尋這究極真理吧!

re: Fei
Cable 冇可能冇英超,如果唔係就危危乎!

 
At Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:31:00 pm, Blogger Ka Lok said...

Re: Fei

兩年半的Contract?不是說笑吧!月費很平嗎?

Re: one ken

睡魔的吸引力在任何時候都比嚴謹科學大。

 

Post a Comment

<< Home